Wednesday, June 25, 2008

What makes a great movie?

Like everywhere, films are a major source of entertainment in India but the scale is much different. Many are die-hard movie fans and there had been quite a few incidents where the fans even sacrificed their lives for their favorite stars. What began as a mass entertainment medium, has grown in the depth and the technology; and today it is not an overstatement to say India is making world class movies (though less in number).

The moment I say world class, the comparison starts. We have too many film industries to compare with - hollywood movies, French movies, Russian movies, you name it... That said, it is not uncommon to find this educated, hi-fi, cosmopolitan dudes (I didn't quote dudes, so no second meaning intended :)) and their encomiums about unknown faces in unknown film industries. Weird names like 'Vandiserslkjao Eroiolklasnsd' (God knows how their parents name them) fill the air and Indian movies are bashed, slandered, abused and equated to mud. The common reasons mentioned - no great actors here, screenplay is not at 'the genius' level, stories aren't so strong. As much as I don't disrespect the unknown talents of the unknown artists, I find it hard to accept that there are no 'good' films produced in India.

Now comes the tricky part. What makes a 'good' film? The common conception is movies that are extremely tragic, slow moving and on a very deep subject; making the audience sob and providing the scope for the artist to demonstrate all that s/he is capable of. I beg to differ here. Unlike filthy rich people who spend a million dollars to get a wall hanging in auctions, a commoner (most often) doesn't look for heavy themes and amazing performance in a movie. His ultimate point is entertainment and if he comes over to the theater to watch a movie, he shouldn't look at his watch every now and then. That is what he considers solid entertainment and the value for his money; and this is not a trend restricted to India alone. Movies like 'x'man where (x = super, spider, bat, etc :)) are all illustrations of this reality.

Personally, I like movies with a heavy subject, crafted screenplays and amazing flow but I'd say the three items below are the basic qualities of a good movie

(a) The audience never look at their watches
(b) The movie doesn't impart any evil into the minds of the viewers
(c) The movie doesn't try to justify something at the cost of entertainment/screenplay

As long as these criteria are met, anything is acceptable as a good movie. What makes a good movie into a great movie is the performance of the actors/actresses, the screenplay, the way the director handles the subject and to an extent the music. When these combinations work out well, the result would be an excellent movie like Shawshank redemption, Tare Zameen Par, Bommarillu or Mozhi. Every country is different and so is its culture. The beauty about movies is that they can transcend these cultural barriers and impress anyone who loves them. I wouldn't accept nullifying this beauty by comparing two movies from a completely different cultural background, with a motive of degrading one of them. A true movie lover would spot and appreciate the beauty in every great movie without any prejudice!

7 comments:

Unknown said...

Maapi ...a difficult topic yet again! You are spot on with all your observations including the X-men (loved that!) ... but the basic qualities you have mentioned seems to be subjective. For instance, 'evil' you have mentioned: The crafty atheism in Anbe sivam is an art; but could be evil for many.

That aside, it is not really easy describe the qualities for a 'great' movie. The same shawshank you have mentioned, was never heard of when it ran on the bigger screens, but now making millions on DVD sale ... so, its just the 'stickiness' factor.

Good one here! And a topic which ppl like me with average intellect can comprehend! :D

Smiles,
Vinayak

Agni said...

'Evil' is always subjective maapla... But what is said in Anbe Sivam is no different from Advaita! If you realize the God in you, you understand that you are not an individual entity! But a few ego-centric dialogs that Kamal introduced into the movie (Unga Sivana varam kudukka sollunga paappaom) fall under my third point (introducing or insisting something at the cost of entertainment/good screenplay). The evil that is said is the most generalized version - terrorism, murders, etc.

And not all good movies impress you instantly. Will you believe that 'Hey Ram' was the only movie where I briefly slept in the theater and it is one of my fav movies today? :)

P.S: Adakkam irukkalaam... Idhu over adakkamaa irukku maapla! :D

ஸ்ரீனிவாசன் said...

Good Topic...but somewhat its dragged to anbe sivam, so i m pitching in.

Maapla, that dialogue was not intended to hurt anyone, the nasser's charecterisation is well known in the movie, he does all crimes and take cover in the name of god , so to enlight him kamal used tat dialogue.

In most of the movies u see policemen\politicians\doctors\software engineers(latest addition) as greedy\criminal\selfish peoples, and heroes delivering bunch of punch dialogues against them ..... appo ellam enna pannikitu irundinga thalaiva????? kadavul la santhikku iluthaa mattum kootamaa sernthu vandu kummuringa???? enna kodumai saravana idu !!!!

Agni said...

Nasser's character is well known in the movie. I completely accept the way the movie ended and it is one of the movies I thoroughly enjoyed. No doubt!

But I'd never accept that the dialog is important in the movie. He could've as well made it 'this is my demand... Either oblige or I might've to talk to your daughter' or even if he wanted to indicate Nasser's bad character he could've made it - 'it's not enough to workship god all along, you have to be good at heart first'. Period. He has no business quoting 'if possible, get it from YOUR siva' and offending the belief of a billion Hindus. The same applies to Karunanidhi too.

India is a democratic country and religion/atheism is an individual's choice. But hurting other's feelings in the name of democracy and intellectual arguments SUCKS! That's what I'm against.

//In most of the movies u see policemen\politicians\doctors\software engineers(latest addition) as greedy\criminal\selfish peoples, and heroes delivering bunch of punch dialogues against them ..... //

Difference here is we are talking beyond characters. We are talking about beliefs. Never equate Lord Siva to a corrupt police officer character. Those are beyond diagonal extremes... If you want to understand the greatness of Lord Siva and the implications behind the parabrahma, wait for a few more days. I'm planning to publish a post on Him!

ஸ்ரீனிவாசன் said...

good provoking reply !!!!, maapla, valakkam pola offline la discuss pannuvom !!!!

Unknown said...

Appdi mean pannala maapi ... I meant that usually your topics are too hi-fi :)

Btw, since I spoke first on Anbe sivam and because it triggered more comments, I am adding some more comments :) First Anbe sivam as a movie is class apart in my opinion and even you have mentioned about your liking towards it. So, there is no discussion there!

As for its theory, there is nothing deceiving. He blatantly portrays his atheism. If he made a movie to (that appears) mean something else and if he just mixes his ideas glibly, then that is a mistake! From what I can see, there is need for the sentiments to be hurt from anything in that movie. Afterall, what else to expect from an atheist?!

Smiles,
Vinayak

Agni said...

Maappi... The movie's intention was not to say God doesn't exist but instead it is to say Love is God. All through it is portrayed well - Madhavan crying for that kid, the last scene where he says forgiving is Godliness and all that. But this Lord Siva crap is from Kamal himself which I'd say is voluntarily intorduced to show his revolutionary genius! Can he do a christian or a muslim character in that position and say a similar dialog? The movie wouldn't have hit the screens at all...

Kamal insulting Hindus esp Saivites is not anything new. But when he mixes his personal opinions into a movie, that is when it becomes awkward... :)